Saturday, 18 October 2014

October 2014 Blindspot Challenge: Re-Animator



I was supposed to do Alfred Hitchcock's The Birds for this month, but unfortunately I had some problems with the DVD. I got partway into the movie and suddenly it froze and began skipping. I couldn't move on without missing some crucial parts to the film and it seemed extremely unlikely that I would be able to find another copy before the end of the month (and even if I was, I can't be sure I'd have another opportunity to see it). Fortunately, I had a few other horror films in my drawer that could go in its place for October's, and one in particular struck me due to its source material.

I therefore have a confession to make. Despite being a huge H.P. Lovecraft fan and my endorsements of the HPLHS adaptations of his stories, I had never seen the cult classic Re-Animator before now. For that matter I have not actually seen any of Stuart Gordon's other Lovecraft adaptations such as Dagon, From Beyond, or the TV treatment of The Dreams in the Witch-House he did for Masters of Horror. I haven't even gotten around to reading the original Lovecraft serial on which this particular film was based, making this the first time with any of his work I've seen the movie before reading the story.

Herbert West–Reanimator as Lovecraft wrote it was supposedly a parody of Frankenstein. Mary Shelley's classic tale (which surprisingly enough, I have read not seen any film adaptations of, unless you count Young Frankenstein) was about a man who tries to scientifically engineer a process to revive the dead. The creature that results from these experiments is a grotesque entity that causes him to immediately regret his hard work. Lovecraft's story takes that concept up several notches by having a scientist reanimate multiple corpses. 

Though Lovecraft himself was not particularly fond of the story (he mainly wrote it for the money and had a lot of frustrating restrictions imposed on him), it does have something of a following with his fans. Maybe it's just because it's a little bit different from his usual horror, but whatever the case may be this is often one that fans will bring up. Naturally it appealed to Stuart Gordon, who given the path of his directorial career is clearly fond of Lovecraft's writing.

Herbert West (Jeffrey Combs), is a brilliant but eccentric medical student based out of an institution in Switzerland, but he gets fired after he is caught performing unorthodox experiments on one of the staff. He moves to America and enrolls at Miskatonic University where he continues to develop his peculiar experiments after moving in with classmate Dan Cain (Bruce Abbott). There he continues to experiment with a fluid he has developed capable of reanimating dead tissue. Things become difficult when Dean Halsey (Robert Sampson) voices opposition to West's experiments. Also thrown into the mix are Halsey's daughter Megan, who is engaged to Dan and gets mixed up in all of West's experiments, and a jerk by the name of Carl Hill (David Gale) who has made a career out of stealing credit for other people's accomplishments.

The whole thing has sort of a b-movie atmosphere, which has a strange kind of charm to it and actually does somewhat fit in with the original story (which was allegedly a parody of Frankenstein). The plot does get over the top and crazy at times, but when the film needs to it can be disturbing. You can naturally expect a lot of gore from a movie about reanimating corpses, and oddly enough the excessive amount of blood does make the appearances of the resurrected human cadavers a bit more disturbing.

Re-Animator is certainly an interesting experience for any major horror fan. It is a bit campy and over the top but it will keep you on the edge of your seat as you are taken through a bizarre sequence of events. It might seem a bit slow at first but once the bodies start rising it'll be a blast, and there is even a bit of emotion to be found in all of this. The main characters are rather likable but Herbert West himself is an especially interesting figure in the way he is driven by the passion of his discovery. I'm sorry I wasn't able to do The Birds as I originally planned, but this one worked alright as a substitute. Give it a watch, you won't regret it.

7 comments:

  1. Happy you got to see this one. It's certainly a B-movie and definitely a parody of Frankenstein. So is the the sequel, Bride of Re-Animator. By the way, I would highly recommend both the original Frankenstein and Bride of Frankenstein.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'll probably have to watch Frankenstein at some point. It would be a logical thing to see come up in that horror class I'm taking next semester. I've only seen stills from Bride of Frankenstein (though it was enough to spot a reference in Young Frankenstein) but that does look like it can go in some interesting directions.

      Delete
  2. This is one of those fun 80s horror flicks that we don't see much of any more (at least in that fevered over the top lets have some real fun with gore effects and horror style). Just like you, I'm a Lovecraft fan, but I had managed to miss this one over the years, and watched it for the first time last year. It was a blast. Combs nearly steals every scene he is in. I love that manic determination he gives the role. He's kinda comical, but also pretty darn scary.

    This is one of HPLs most pulpy stories, so I think the pulp approach to the film works well. Gordon uses the original concept as a starting point, but really goes in his own direction with it. That's fine with me, because it keeps things fresh and fun, especially with type of approach.

    I've seen several of his films. "Dagon" is worth checking out. It uses "Innsmouth" as the core to the script, but does take some interesting detours. Like "Re-animator" it goes a bit over the top at times, but it has some really disturbing moments. He also did a fine job with "Dreams in the Witch House". That is a tough story to make work visually, and again he does some editing and reimagining, due mostly to budget and time constraints. But the overall core of the story is there and it was pretty good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd be open to seeing some of Stuart Gordon's other work after this one. I'd been a bit reluctant to see Dagon because of the mixed reviews but I think it could be worth looking at. I've always said that David Lynch would be a great choice to direct a film of The Dreams in the Witch-House but I'd certainly be interested in seeing Gordon's take if I could find it.

      Delete
    2. Oh man Lynch on Dreams in the Witch House would be amazing! Good call. I'm pretty sure it will go off into its own Lynchian world and veer away from HPLs original plot - and you know what, I'd be perfectly fine with that. :)

      Delete
  3. This sounds like an original remake of the Frankenstein story and your critique makes it sound interesting. The characters sound so B movie style. Too bad about the Birds and that has happened to me and it is so annoying! I too recommend you see both Frankenstein stories. Keep in mind that the scene with the little girl was cut out for decades. Also keep in mind the director was very gay and had no problem expressing this when he shouldn't have and he died under mysterious circumstances. Actually Gods and Monsters is an excellent film

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well it's not really a remake of Frankenstein so much as it is an adaptation of a novella that was a parody of Frankenstein. I will probably have to see the actual Frankenstein movies at some point, though.

      Delete