This week, the theme for Wanderer's Thursday Movie Picks Meme is black and white movies made since 1970. Black and white photography is often associated more with the early days of both photography and cinema. Many old pictures and movies were made in black and white. This included many early films (barring a few specific auteurs, like Georges Méliès, who actually took the time to literally paint their films frame by frame). Colour was experimented with in the silent period, but even in the early Studio Era it was mostly reserved for special films that the studios expected to be a success. It was not until the 1950's, with the advent of television, that colour started to become more popular (it was one of many different tactics film companies used to try and compete with the new medium).
Over the course of the 1960's it became more and more common, and suddenly things got turned around in the 70's. Where once colour had been a rare luxury, it was now common in filmmaking, and it was the old-fashioned black and white photography that proved something reserved for specific projects. As John Hurt noted in the documentary The Elephant Man Revealed, actual black and white film was very hard to get by 1980, usually only being sold to students. Shooting an entire movie in black and white is a rare occurrence now, and something generally done more as a stylistic choice more than as a way of conserving the budget.
For this week I've been tasked to find three of these black and white films made since 1970. I've been trying to find some that are less obvious. There are two really good choices (Eraserhead and Young Frankenstein) that I've already done for previous entries. What I've decided to do here is pick one good movie and one bad movie (both from the same year), and one more recent hidden gem that I think is really worth seeing..
Raging Bull (1980)
Why do people like this movie again? I had to watch it for a class once and couldn't stand it. The experience I had was a needlessly jarring and almost incomprehensible film. I took reading an IMDB synopsis even to get an idea that the basic plot was about a boxer with a really bad temper who takes out his frustrations on his family. When I did finally get forced to watch the entire thing I had to have an IMDB synopsis on hand just to keep myself with some idea of what was happening, and I still stand by my claim that this movie stole its Oscars from the other black and white period drama that rightfully deserved them. Martin Scorsese had a few reasons for shooting his film in black and white, which was mainly that he wanted to distinguish his movie from other colour films at the time. Fading colour stock was also an issue at the time, and Scorsese hoped that shooting in black and white would get around that problem.
The Elephant Man (1980)
David Lynch has actually made a few black and white films, most if not all of them comprising his early work. This includes many of his early shorts such as The Alphabet and The Amputee, but as a stylistic choice it is more commonly associated with his first two features. While Eraserhead used black and white imagery to its advantage, adding to the general unease of the film, Lynch used it to an entirely different end in his next film. The Elephant Man was the film that established him as a mainstream director, and like Eraserhead, he shot the film in black and white. The reason why he did this was because the film was a period piece set in Victorian England. Drawing inspiration from old black and white photographs, both Lynch and producer Mel Brooks (who previously made similar choices in Young Frankenstein) felt it needed to be in black and white to create a properly old-fashioned feeling and lend a sense of authenticity to the film's setting.
The Call of Cthulhu (2005)
Talk about going above and beyond. The Call of Cthulhu goes a few steps past being simply a modern black and white film. Not only did the filmmakers refrain from using colour photography, but they also presented it as a silent movie. The idea was that The Call of Cthulhu was to look as though it had been made around the same time as the original H.P. Lovecraft short story it was based on was first published (in 1927). This particular film not only manages to present a faithful and at times even chilling rendition of Lovecraft's text but also serves as a very effective tribute to the silent era. It may have been released in 2005, but it legitimately resembles a film made in the late 1920's.
I've seen both Raging Bull and The Elephant Man. I love both, but understand that the first rubs some people the wrong way. For me, the performances are all off-the-charts good and I love that it doesn't play out like your typical biopic. It has a rawness to it that I really enjoy. No doubt it's a tough film to watch, with an almost irredeemable rendering of Jake LaMotta, but I have it as arguably the best sports movie ever made.
ReplyDeleteAh, I can think of a few sports movies I would rather watch than Raging Bull. I think The Elephant Man works better because it's so much more straight forward but at the same time not too much so. Lynch manages to make it comprehensible while simultaneously doing his own thing with it (as is especially evident during the beginning, end, and at least one dream sequence).
DeleteThe Elephant Man is my March Blindspot, and I wrote this post before I saw it. I wish I would've gone back to edit it because it's definitely one of my favorites now. Great picks!
ReplyDeleteThe Elephant Man was a pretty impressive movie. It's probably one of Lynch's most easily accessible films (probably second to The Straight Story, with Blue Velvet in third due to it still having a comprehensible story but some really weird stuff at the same time) but when Lynch feels that something needs to be kept simple he can pull something really good out of it.
DeleteI still have to see Raging Bull because it never appealed to me to see an ill-tempered oaf but one day, I will. I love the Elephant Man and felt John Hurt deserved an Oscar. You have mentioned the last film before (I believe) and it does sound quite intriguing but I don't think I can get it around my neighbourhood. Great write up
ReplyDeleteI have brought up The Call of Cthulhu from time to time. Actually, I did a review of it back when I was running Halloween Horror last year. Sadly, it is a hard one to find (an unfortunate side effect of it being an extremely low-budget independent film with no major stars) but if you can see it you won't regret it.
DeleteI don't agree on Raging Bull, as I love the film, BUT...I do agree that The Elephant Man is the superior film!!! Brilliant movie, so transcending, so moving and so brutally honest. LOVE that movie so much!
ReplyDeleteGreat list! Raging Bull is on my Blind Spots list.
ReplyDeleteThat's unfortunate. I can't say I envy you having to see it.
DeleteRaging Bull is a superb film, and I never found it hard to follow at all. I dig all the anger and temper and frustration and yelling and screaming and sweat and blood and the black-and-white is a genius stylistic move there for me. The Elephant Man is one I just haven't seen since I was probably in middle school and then, of course, it wasn't for me. I think my Mom was watching it, and I just happened to be in the room. I am definitely down to give it a try. I pretty much can't stand David Lynch movies (at least the couple I've actually watched all the way through), but this one seems as if it's not typical Lynch.
ReplyDeleteYour third pick I've never heard of. But I love when filmmakers really try to hit a time period look and succeed.
If by "Typical Lynch" you're thinking of the weird and subjective style of Eraserhead and a lot of his later films like Lost Highway, Mulholland Drive, and Inland Empire, than no, it's not "typical" of Lynch. It's actually quite straight forward outside of a few specific moments of abstraction (and even those have a reasonably clear intention). Lynch actually has a few more straight forward films, The Elephant Man being his best known. He also did Blue Velvet (which has a comprehensible story but a lot of weird stuff going on within it) and the fittingly-named The Straight Story (a straight forward story about an Old Man driving a tractor with none of the usual weirdness associated with Lynch). Dune was probably intended to have a clear narrative as well, though a lot of its problems come from the efforts to condense a rather long novel into a summer blockbuster.
DeleteThe Call of Cthulhu I would definitely recommend checking out. Technically, the filmmakers used a mix of modern and vintage techniques that they lovingly named "Mythoscope" but the end result still looks like it was made in the 1920's. Also interesting when you hear some of the stories about the difficulties they faced behind the scenes (if I remember correctly, there was one point where the crew actually managed to somehow get an authentic car from the early 20th century... but nobody knew how to drive it).
I'm not a fan of Raging Bull either, the acting was fine but once was enough, really more than enough, for me. I'm not much of a Lynch fan but of his films The Elephant Man is far and away my favorite. Great acting, John Hurt is brilliant of course but I think Anne Bancroft is excellent as well.
ReplyDeleteI'm very intrigued by The Call of Cthulhu. I've been trying to watch more silents but not indiscriminately since they can be as variable as sound film and some are just painful to view now. I've been trying to see either ones with a solid reputation or ones that are recommended. I'm doubly interested in this one because I recently watched the Lon Chaney/Joan Crawford silent The Unknown, a TRULY bizarre horror film about an armless knife thrower in the circus and the magician's assistant with a fear of hands that he loves at a distance that was actually made in '27. I'm curious to compare the two so thanks for the tip!
It probably does have a bit of influence from those old silent horror films. There's probably also a bit of German Expressionism in there somewhere (the scenes depicting R'lyeh springing to mind). The Call of Cthulhu is one I'd definitely recommend.
DeleteI hadn't heard of that third one and that's why I love being able to do this. Someone else has discovered the hidden gems for me!
ReplyDeleteI haven't seen any of your picks, but The Elephant Man seems interesting and something I'd like to watch. I hope it doesn't disappoint!
ReplyDelete