Night of the Living Dead: Why the Remake is Better.

When I decided on watching George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead for my Blindspot Challenge, I did so knowing a few things. I will have to make that confession that due to a prior class several years ago, I already knew about the ending and the significance of the fact that it was Ben alone who made it to the end. I also knew that it had some issues with regards to how it treated Barbara, who at the time I was led to believe was the only female character (which is not in fact the case). Say what you will about the original 1968 film, but it did have its problems. While it was remarkable on some fronts, the story had its flaws with the extremely contrived situations and underdeveloped supporting characters.

Naturally, when I finally had to watch Night of the Living Dead in its entirety for another class (forcing me to change up the order of my list), I found myself curious about the 1990 remake. I had been told that it addresses a lot of the problems of the original 1968 film. Remakes in general have a reputation for being inferior to the original, especially in horror. In some cases that is indeed the case, such as with Jan De Bont's remake of The Haunting, or at the very most, the remake is entertaining but not as good as the original. However, once in a while you get a remake that actually matches or on a rare occasion even surpasses the quality of its predecessor such as David Cronenberg's The Fly, Zack Snyder's Dawn of the Dead, or John Carpenter's The Thing. Tom Savini's remake of Night of the Living Dead is one of those rare accomplishments.

Plot-wise, the movie is more or less the same, at least in terms of its setup. Barbara (Patricia Tallman) and her brother Johnnie (Bill Moseley) are have just arrived a cemetery to place new flowers on their mother's grave when suddenly zombies show up. Johnnie gets killed and Barbara just barely escapes. She arrives at a seemingly abandoned farmhouse where she eventually encounters Ben (Tony Todd), and the two of them try to work together to survive against the zombies. Later on a few other people turn out to be hiding in the basement, which includes Harry "I Want to Lock Myself in the Cellar" Cooper (Tom Towles) who refuses to cooperate and causes a lot of trouble. However, there are a few new twists and turns to be found this time round, ranging from minor details (making Harry's infected daughter a teenager instead of a little girl) to drastic changes in character.

The most notable change is the revision of Barbara's character. In the original George A. Romero film, Barbara spends the majority of its running time sitting on a couch in a traumatized and semi-delirious state of mind only to end up getting killed when she tries to do something useful. At first it looks like her counterpart in the remake is going through something similar, except she actually manages to pull her weight despite the obvious trauma she has been through. She does cry and scream several times in the early scenes, but she goes on to begin learning to protect herself and, along with Ben, taking on a leadership role. This is precisely how the relationship between them should have played out in the original film.

There are some changes in the rest of the cast as well. They actually have personalities now which is a nice change. Harry, or Crazy Cellar Guy as I like to call him, is far worse than his 1968 counterpart. In the older film, he was just annoyingly stubborn and had difficulty listening to people. Here he really is a horrible person who treats everyone like crap, including his own wife who he even hits at one point. Said wife (McKee Anderson) actually gets a personality this time, and while her 1968 counterpart did speak out against her husband's actions, this time she actually gets to stand up to him. Judy is a bit more panicked than in Romero's film, but she does manage to be useful and gets an actual motive for joining Tom in trying to get Ben's truck refueled instead of charging into a hoard of zombies for no other reason than because of her love.

As far as the characters are concerned, it is definitely an improvement over the original. Ben is still a strong character who remains true to what made him such a crucial part of the original while also addressing its questionable treatment of women. The rest of the film also flows a lot better. For example in the original, Tom and Judy's deaths seemed very contrived and the circumstances leading to the gasoline disaster that kills them are not very well explained (for some reason they try to pour the gasoline before putting the nozzle into the truck's tank) and Judy dies because her jacket gets caught. In the remake, there is actually a far more straight forward explanation for how the fire starts and there's no more of that "my jacket's stuck" nonsense.

While George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead holds a cultural significance as the movie that popularized the modern image of zombies, Tom Savini's remake is a far better film on every possible level. All of the problems with Romero's film are addressed and fixed here, which allows for a few new changes that help to improve the narrative such as Barbara's far more interesting characterization and even a very different ending (which I won't give away). It is a great film and definitely worth checking out, perhaps far more so than the original. This time around, the remake is definitely an improvement.

Blindspot: Night of the Living Dead (1968)

I had to change around the order of my list for this one, as an unforseen scheduling issue prevented me from seeing it when I originally intended. When I chose to include George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead in my 2015 Blindspot List, I meant to watch it for Halloween. I had a DVD copy sitting in my drawer for a few years that I had not yet gotten around to watching, along with all the other films on my list. Everything was all worked out, and I'd even developed a few rough ideas of which movies I was going to watch during specific months. Unfortunately, one thing happened I had no way of anticipating: it turned out it was being shown in one of my classes during the last of week of January, and by the time I found out I'd already done my blindspot entry for that month. The simplest solution was to move Night of the Living Dead into February, since I was not sure if I would have time to watch any of the other movies on my list anyway.

Now that I've gotten that out of the way, we can get on with the movie itself. The story is pretty simple, and summed up more or less by the title. Night of the Living Dead takes place over the course of a night, and there are malevolent reanimated human cadavers staggering around. This particular movie does have a certain historical significance from a cultural perspective in that it was responsible for popularizing the modern image of zombies as monstrous flesh-eating corpses. A lot of the groundwork can be seen here, with elements that would get picked up by many later films, particularly in the generally bleak tone as well as the fact that the zombies consume human flesh and can only be killed by destroying their brain. It is also implied that being bit by one turns the victim into a zombie themselves.

There is also one element here that is not as popular in zombie films, though it will no doubt be familiar to viewers of The Walking Dead: everyone is infected. Night of the Living Dead runs with the idea that not only do the protagonists have to worry about the zombies outside, but also each other. The tension that develops among the small group of survivors is what ultimately ends up being their downfall, a theme that would recur prominently in The Walking Dead; a series in which the tension between survivors mounts to a point where the zombies themselves begin to feel more like an annoyance than a serious threat.

There are some sociological issues that should also be addressed regarding Night of the Living Dead. The story is in many ways about twisting social norms of the period, something particularly evident in the decision to focus primarily on a black man, Ben, and a woman, Barbara (who for a large portion of the film are the only two characters). Later on a middle-aged white man tries to take control of the situation for no other reason because that is what he is used to. Ultimately, Ben (Duane Jones) is the person who has to take control of the situation and the one man who knows how to survive. The fact that he is the only one to make it through the night (only to get mistaken for a zombie and shot when help finally arrives) serves to emphasize the point.

However, there is a question of how Romero treats women. While many of his later films make an effort to include stronger female roles (including the remake of Night of the Living Dead, for which he served as executive producer), it is debatable whether that applies here. There are four female characters among the main cast, but the only one who really gets any focus is Barbara, played by Judith O'Dea. While she begins by showing a degree of self-reliance (she manages to work her way to the farmhouse independently, evading a few zombies in the process), she spends the majority of the film in a traumatized state. She is largely unable to think for herself and requires protection from Ben. This aspect is also not helped by the fact that she gets killed just when she starts to get her act together and actually tries to help barricade the house once its down to her and Ben.

As for the other three female characters, none of them get much development. These include Helen (Marylin Eastman), Judy (Judith Ridley) and Karen (Kyra Schon). Helen is the wife of one of the supporting characters, Harry (Karl Hardman) and to be fair she gets some intelligence as she is the one calling him out on his foolishness (he keeps insisting he needs to lock himself in the cellar). Judy is apparently the girlfriend of another supporting character, Tom (Keith Wayne), but it is not very well explained. Karen is the daughter of Harry and Helen, who gets very little development as she has already been bit by a zombie. Judy is especially notable as she is killed shortly after being introduced and while she seems promising at first, she literally runs outside into a hoard of zombies and gets herself blown up for no other reason than because she loves Tom; not exactly the smartest move on her part.

As for the rest of the film, I honestly found it to be a bit campy. The ending works to great effect, but I found everything up to it to be very predictable. It was obvious from the moment that little girl was first introduced that she was going to turn out to have been bitten and then turn into a zombie. The zombies themselves were okay, but a lot of the situations seemed contrived; particularly in the ways that certain characters die (what happened to Judy being a perfect example). The acting is okay, though the only two characters that really stand out are Ben and Barbara, with Ben's presence being a nice touch but Barbara could have worked a lot better if she had not spent most of the movie sitting on a couch in a half-delirious state of mind only to get killed off as soon as she actually started to do something useful. The editing is also a bit choppy at times, and there are some jarring inconsistencies (the way that scenes on the television showed things happening in the same area during the day even though this is supposed to be night).

Ultimately, while Night of the Living Dead does have a cultural significance, it really has not aged well. While I can respect the things it does do well, such as Ben's characterization, it ultimately feels extremely contrived with a largely underdeveloped cast. The effects are alright, but sociologically its treatment of women makes it difficult to sit through. It is not a bad movie, though, on account of the things it does get right; it just does not have the same impact it did in 1968. I would be open to seeing the 1990 remake, which I have been told improves on many of the problems of the original (particularly in how Barbara is treated). Perhaps I will respond to that one better.